I you are not inebriated; you may recall this blog took on a
community service role last week advising the population of the hypothesized
existence of a ninth planet (Planet X
minus one 1/22/16). I assured you
all that this information was based on mathematical models designed to explain idiosyncrasies
in the orbit of Neptune. As so, there
was no need to get excited about this phenomenon as no direct observations had
yet been made.
I also shared that such hypotheses had existed for many
years; long before the demotion of Pluto to dwarf planet status by Big
Astronomy. Thus the theoretical planet
had been dubbed “Planet X”; a play on the fact that it was unknown and the
roman numeral for the number ten, “X”.
I also asserted that the planet had not been named.
Oops!
I learned this week, from Rob Waugh’s Yahoo Blog, that indeed the new Planet “X” had been
named “Nibiru”. It seems that there is a
conspiracy culture out there (on the fringes of human population here on Earth,
not on Nibiru) that predicts this unseen world is going to destroy Earth. One Zecharia Sitchin, a writer (and we all
know the value of information advanced by writers), claimed aliens from Nibiru
created the human race. Mr. Sitchin is
unavailable for comment on these recent developments as he is currently dead
(RIP 2010… I wonder if there is any numerological connection between Planet “X”
and the year of his death).
From here, Mr. Waugh’s reporting gets a bit murky as I am
not sure when he is quoting Sitchin, or Nigel Watson (author of UFO Investigations Manual… who knew
there was one… Christmas is just around the corner) quoting Sitchin stating
that Nibiru is populated by the Anunnaki’ an advanced humanoid race who visited
Earth thousands of years (ago?) to mine gold in Africa. Needing a supply of workers, they used
genetic engineering to create Homo Sapiens (that’s us).
So there you have it, the sum total of my knowledge on
Planet “X”: Last week, innocuous mathematical
formula; this week source of the apocalypse. I warned you about naming it!
I am sure that by now you have heard of the “discovery” of a
new planet. I italicize discovery
because its use stretches the definition of that word. No actual empirical or observational evidence
exists that there is indeed a planet (using the modern definition of planet
which caused the exclusion of Pluto from that sorority) in our solar system
beyond Neptune. And further, this is not
new science. I have been following the
discussion for years that a heretofore unrealized planet was out there
perturbing the orbit of Neptune. It was
those very observations of Neptunian idiosyncratic behavior which led to the
Pluto hypothesis and subsequent observation.
Many astronomers were critical of the assignation of such gravitational
influence by Pluto because it was just too small (not enough mass to influence the
orbit of a gas giant, eg, Neptune. They
therefore hypothesized that a tenth, much larger planet, was in fact
responsible for the observable orbit of Neptune. They called that theoretical world Planet “X”; for its unknown placement
and the roman numeral for ten. Astronomers
always like to add a bit of whimsy into their dissertations in hopes it will
help them get laid. It doesn’t.
Moving along to the twenty-first century, as alluded to
above, the scientific community, probably in an attempt to distract us from the
fact that the dogma of global warming was coming apart at the seams, invented a
new controversy involving the nomenclature of celestial phenomena which
resulted in the defrocking of Pluto.
There were two main fallouts associated with this: One was the public
outcry at the demotion of their beloved ice ball; the other was the obsolescence
of the moniker Planet “X”. One of the
earliest lessons taught me by my father was, “Don’t name the dog that followed
you home son, because you can’t keep it anyway.” Too late, the media has already dubbed this
placeholder planet, Planet 9. Now it only remains to see if Disney Studios will
create a new cartoon character as its namesake.
Neptune
“So Dale,” you ask, “How come we can’t see the new planet?” Well children, the truth is, it’s way, way
out there. The average orbital distance
from the Sun to Neptune is 30.1 AU (astronomical unit – approximately 93
million miles, or the distance from the Sun to the Earth). Planet Nine’s (if indeed it is out there at
all) distance at its closest orbital point is 200 AU. Its orbital period is believed to be 15,000
years, give or take a five millennia.
“But Dale, how do we know this stray won’t be demoted as
Pluto was.?” Well, because it is big;
about the same size as Neptune. While
Pluto is just a little bitty runt. A
ball of rock and ice in the Kuyper belt where it seems to be just one of many;
some of which appear to be much larger than Pluto.
So there you go kids.
Once again science has proven unequivocally that size matters. Even if you can’t see it. Any questions?
Just wanted to take this opportunity demonstrate how much
smarter I am than everybody else.
This morning (Friday, January 15, 2016) I was perusing the
news stories on my home page so thoughtfully, albeit slowly, provided by
ATT.net. It is my wont to read anything
I find about cosmology (the study of the origins of the Universe, not hair
styling) and physics. Today I hit a
treasure trove of personal validation!
If you tried to read the article to which you were directed
by following the link above but found it just a bit too esoteric, welcome to
the club. So, in my humble fashion, I
will paraphrase and get to the meat of the matter (meat of the matter, that’s a
physics joke… which just goes to show you I am not a humorless nerd). The article quotes Harry Cliff (no, I don’t know
who he is either), “It's the idea that we are reaching the absolute limit of
what we can understand about the world around us through science.” I think
he is just being a whiner; probably got turned down for that last grant
proposal. Every time science stalls a
bit, someone says, “That’s it, we’ve learned everything it is possible to
know. The rest will remain a mystery!” Horse Hockey!
But that is not the point of this special blog entry. The point is for me to brag.
In the article the author references the phenomenon of dark
energy. This is the mysterious force to
which cosmologists assign responsibility for the accelerating expansion of the
Universe. While scientists have been
able to measure the force, they cannot identify the source or cause. It is a mystery. “Still, we don't know what dark energy
is," Cliff admits. "But the best idea is that it's the energy of
empty space itself — the energy of the vacuum."
I now refer you to my blog posting of April 16, 2014, The Big Suck! in which I wrote:
I will propose that perhaps there is
nothing out there; just a big vacuum. And that our universe is expanding
into the void. That would explain how the expansion is
accelerating. As the stuff in our universe is expanding in all directions,
the gravitational attraction of galaxies is weakened by the increasing distance
between them, therefore allowing the expansion to accelerate. The
universe is not being pushed from within, but pulled from without!
Huzzah! Yes, I’m
tooting my horn. Basking in my own
self-generated spotlight. You are so
lucky to know me. Nobel nominations
should be submitted by September one. Now,
if only I could do the math.
Powerball mania is sweeping the globe. People from states that do not participate in
the contest are journeying to those that do.
Persons living outside the country are traveling for the chance to win
the big pot. I am nonplussed. Being a numbers guy, I am too much aware of
the odds involved and so, am unable to generate and enthusiasm for participating.
Add to that my personal history of having never won a contest of any kind that
was based on pure chance, I would rather spend the money on a well-made
burrito. At least then I would know the
true value of my purchase. And that
funny feeling in the pit of my stomach wouldn’t be a response to the realization
that my dreams had been dashed against the rocks of disappointment, but rather
a mild case of indigestion.
And how about that question that everyone asks, “What would
you do with all of that money?” I
believe the answer to that question is fairly obvious. First, you would spend a great deal of time, money
and energy laying out a plan with a very high-powered tax attorney. Second, you would spend the majority of the
rest of your time avoiding the horde of family, friends, strangers and
charitable causes eager to feed from the crumbs falling off of the edges of
your new-found fortune.
But just suppose you were to escape the neuroses and guilt
with a bit of your fortune intact. How
would you spend it? Remember, you
probably opted for the lump sum payment (most financial advisors would suggest
that option… oh yeah, you’re going to want a really talented CFP too) so right
off the top you’re giving away about one-half of the face value; you start with
about $750 million. Don’t panic, your
CFP will be able to design a strategy by which you earn more through wise
investing than you gave up by taking the cash value. Next in line will be the government taxing
authorities to collect their shares. Let’s
say you are lucky enough to live in a state that exempts lottery winnings from
state taxation. Then we will set your
federal tax rate at somewhere around forty percent (that’s a nice round number). You know have $450 million. Humph!
Even using rounding, you can’t call yourself a billionaire.
So now that you have arrived at a usable figure that you
can spend, what do you want to buy?
Well, do you like to travel? I
would bet that most people, especially those likely to buy power ball tickets, have
seen little of the world in which they live and believe this would be a good
use of their new found wealth. But then
Europe is being overrun with Semitic refugees some of whom are prone to
disruptive behavior; you may want to put that off until later. One could always travel to Latin
America. However, it seems that so much
of the available labor force has emigrated to the United States, that there
wouldn’t be anyone left to provide that first class service you will want to
become accustom to as a “one-third of a billionaire”. India?
Too hot and crowded. Asia? Much sword rattling going on recently. Africa? Malaria! Australia?
Woman shortage. Russia? Too cold.
Now I have heard that New Zealand is a wonderful place full of friendly
people. But then you have enough money
to buy the whole county. What would you
do with all those sheep. I mean, with
global warming being such an imminent threat, sweater manufacturing is a
declining industry.
Well, maybe domestic travel would be more to your liking. Road trip? I mean, you could buy any kind of car you
wanted: Mercedes, Jaguar, Aston-Martin, Bentley, Rolls-Royce. As nice as those automobiles are though, you
see them everywhere. They wouldn’t
really mark you as a top-tier traveler.
How about a first-class motor home?
But then every retired teacher has one of those (good union, good
retirement).
You certainly would not continue in your job. Just think how much extra time you would have
by ditching that eight-hour routine.
With all that extra time, you could spend more with the spouse to reinvigorate
the old romance. You might as well,
statistics show that of couples who win a big jackpot, ninety-eight percent
stay married. There were no statistics
available for how may started taking separate vacations. Or you could start that hobby you were always
interested in. Of course, you have
enough money now that you could just pay someone who knows what they’re doing to
build all of that custom furniture.
How about a new house?
With your fortune you could live in any zip code you wished. But do you really want your old friends scratching
up that travertine floor with their Red Wing boots? You’re comfortable in the old digs
anyway. Who needs more rooms to
clean? But on the other hand, you could
hire a maid, give the missus an opportunity to get out of the house on her
own. That’s it! You need a maid!
If you follow my musings you know that I am not a global
warming denier, but very skeptical about the influence of human activity,
likelihood of catastrophic (existential) outcomes, and the need for radical
action that would unbalance the global economy.
I am very confident of my position because I listen to the argument put
forth by “the majority of the scientific community” versus that professed by
career meteorologists. And to my ear,
the people who actually make their living studying weather phenomena and can
understand the physics involved (the meteorologists, in case it wasn’t clear),
make the most cogent argument regarding the runaway greenhouse effect, which to
date can be distilled into one neat little package. Hooey!
Then there are the astronomers. I like people who have figured out a way to
make a living staring at the sky. I only
wish I could have been born with the math genes that would allow me to joint their
ranks. Unfortunately, once I try to
cross that bridge separating algebra from arithmetic, a nasty troll emerges
with his big stick and knocks me into a ditch.
But I digress. The point is, the
astronomers are telling me that the earth’s atmosphere is warming because the energy
output from the sun has been, since birth, increasing and will continue to do
so until it runs out of fuel (5 billion years, give or take a millennium), and
we don’t want to be around for that. Fortunately,
we won’t, as temperature increases brought about by this natural phenomenon
will make the planet untenable for human life in somewhere between 10,000 to
100,000 years (boy I wish I’d had that kind of margin of error when working up
cash flow projections).
So I get kind of annoyed when people on the green train tell
me what kind of light bulbs to use and such.
But today, I am taking a more cautious posture toward this weather
thing. For the first time in my life, I
am living under the threat of a tornado
alert (per KGTV). Yes, right here in
San Diego… and that starts with “S” … and that stands for “Shit!”
Now I am no expert, but I have been living under the
impression that tornados were warm weather phenomena. And let me tell you, it has not been warm or
anywhere near it here in paradise for the past few weeks. Like right now I’m sitting here typing away
on this masterpiece at 1642 hrs. (PST) and it is sixty-four (64oF)
degrees… indoors! I don’t know where you all come from, but 64o
is not warm!
Now I know some of my readers live in harsher climes where
these conditions would seem downright balmy.
But wearing a flannel shirt around the house is just unnatural. If God had intended us to gird ourselves
against the weather, he would have given us fur. Come to think of it, chimpanzees have lots of
body hair and they live in the tropics.
I’m starting to wonder if Darwin may have missed a few links.
Well anyway, if you don’t hear from me next week. just assume
I was sucked up to Oz in a twister.
After all, I do live on The Yellow Brick Road (yeah, I do… really!).