As is my wont, on a recent Sunday A.M., I tuned into Fox
News Channel to blow the early morning cobwebs from my brain. As is their wont, the segment airing was a
discussion of medical and health news. One of the regular contributors, Dr.
Marc Siegel, was speaking to the state of care for Alzheimer’s disease. He
stated, and I am paraphrasing here, that Alzheimer’s was being underserved in
the research community. Citing reduction in heart disease and cancer related death
rates, Dr. Siegel proffered that similar gains could be made in the field of
Alzheimer’s care had the funding for research had been brought to bear.
Now there is nothing inimically wrong with that statement
but still, it set my intellectual alarm off.
Why? Because it infers that an increase in the effectiveness of
treatment for Alzheimer’s would result in a decrease in deaths. And we know, or at least we should, that this
is not true. If we were successful in
eradicating heart disease (touted by medicos to be the single most common cause
of death) would we reduce the rate of death? No, because life and death have a
one-to-one correlation and causation. Everybody that is born dies; and life is
a prerequisite for death. Let me
restate. If you have life, it will
result in death. And, to complete the
cycle, death cannot occur unless there is life.
Tomorrow could bring us a one hundred percent effective cure
for cancer. If we did, would we have
saved the lives of those currently stricken or who are future victims of the
disease? No. We would simply shift the
cause of their eventual demise to some other morbidity. As Dr. Benjamin Franklin averred, “The only
thing certain in life is death and taxes.”
In discussions of this topic,
I have heard the argument that with advances in science and technologies like
cloning, the human race may be able to extend life interminably. I don’t buy
it. To bolster my position, I introduce the concept of entropy (there’s one for
you, Tink). From the smallest subatomic
particle to the entirety of the universe, everything will run out of energy
eventually. If creation is slated for a cold, dark destiny, what chance does a
fragile glob of bio-molecular flotsam have?
“Oh! Don’t be such a negative
Nelly.” you might say. And at this
juncture, I will shift the discussion to economics. Do you see what I did there; I lured you in
with a peek at your own mortality. You
know it’s true that if I had opened this missive with a nod to the dismal
science by the second paragraph, you would have abandoned me, trotting off to
watch Jersey Shore and I would have only two readers left; one of them being in
Germany (Hi, Nicky… miss you).
First, let’s define economics.
According to Webster’s New World
Dictionary, economics is; “the science that deals with the production,
distribution and consumption of wealth…”
Webster is wrong. Economics is a
branch of the social sciences (although neither Economics nor the other social
sciences, e.g. Psychology, Sociology, et al is eager to admit it); it deals
with the study of human behavior in an environment of scarce resources. The
best definition I have encountered is from Wikipedia: http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics
.
Economics is, put simply, about
people making choices in a world where one cannot have everything. Yeah, I know, the talking heads would have
you believe that greater minds developed masterful methods for predicting
global financial trends and prescribing fiscal policies to maximize the welfare
of mankind. But look to their record to
date; pretty dismal, huh? Any one of you, allocating moneys from of your
periodic paycheck, does a better job of making choices based on predicted
outcomes than clowns like John Maynard Keynes or Paul Krugman. And that,
finally, brings us to the point of this heretofore seemingly meaningless
rambling.
Life, put in Economics terms,
is all about making choices. With the
limited resources at our disposal we each, individually and collectively, must
decide how to allocate them in the most beneficial manner. This practice of
this dismal science at the community level, as seen in the current events of
our time, leads to conflict and controversy.
It always has and it always will.
Trust me; the collective wisdom of all the ages will never create the
path to universal agreement on what constitutes the ideal existence. Ergo, we
will concentrate the remainder of this discussion (if one can properly refer to
an individual’s inane ramblings as a discussion) to the person.
Certainly, if you are reading
this, you understand the concept of possession and assets. Assets come in many forms. There are tangible assets, e.g., money, real
estate, automobiles, investment instruments (yes, I know, sometimes it seems
like our 401(k)s are more ethereal in nature and evaporate into nothingness at
the whim of Chairman Bernanke, but fragile as they are, qualify as tangible),
boats and wine. And there are intangible
assets; health, intellect, charisma, intelligence, ambition and peace of
mind.
What is the most precious of
resources? I will give you a hint. It can be traded away, but once spent, can
never be recovered. We all have an abundant supply of it at our disposal with
no associated cost but at the same time can never quantify the exact amount we
possess. That’s right; the single most
valuable commodity we own is time. And that is the tieback to the opening of
this post. Time is limited for all of us, as we know that we must die and
cannot predict when time will run out.
Think then, about how you
spend your time. Do you allocate it
wisely, ensuring the most value for your life? Or do you fritter it away
engaged in panic driven activity chasing one shiny bauble after the next? Only you can set the path that will result in
a life of true satisfaction.
So given that time is the most
valuable of all commodities, it behooves us to make the most of it; to wisely
consider the value of that for which we trade it. Once squandered, its balance cannot be
rebuilt. Therefore I must ask you,” What are doing sitting there reading this
dribble?” Get off your ass and go do
something worthwhile!
I was only reading this babble because I'm waiting for a train. So really, I'm multitasking and getting the most out of my wasted time... : )
ReplyDeleteI miss you guys too!
Thanks for the laughs!
-Nicky
OMG, anybody that can use inimically interminably entropy in a paragraph needs to reconsider their vocation. Very deep.
ReplyDeleteWhat I do is open up the dictionary to a random page, select a few words that seem to like each other, then fill in two- and three-letter utility words between the impressive ones and hope through some miracle of probability that it reads like it makes sense... I never really know what these posts mean!
Delete